Adopting roles: Generosity and Presumptuousness
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Evaluating the Risk of Adopting RBAC Roles
We propose a framework to evaluate the risk incurred when managing users and permissions through RBAC. The risk analysis framework does not require roles to be defined, thus making it applicable before the role engineering phase. In particular, the proposed approach highlights users and permissions that markedly deviate from others, and that might consequently be prone to error when roles are o...
متن کاملMethodological Individualism and Generosity
Today a convergence between the fields of anthropology and economics has re-emerged after decades during which the dictates of methodological individualism, as strikingly elucidated by Kenneth Arrow, had seriously limited and hampered effective scholarship in studies of economic and social development in developing countries. A new generation of development economists represented by Spolaori an...
متن کاملGenericity, Generosity, and Tori
Bruno Poizat is associated, among other things, with broadening the scope of the theory of groups of finite Morley rank to the level of stable groups [P87], in keeping with the general trend of the development of model theory from Morley to Shelah. But this has not prevented him from taking an active interest in such aspects of the theory as are associated more particularly with the case of fin...
متن کاملGenerosity, anonymity, gender
We examine experimentally how a person’s generosity depends on the degree of anonymity between giver and recipient, as well as on the parties’ sexes. Less is given when the giver is paid on stage rather than in private; men receive less than women; fewer men than women give non-zero amounts. The results suggest that it may be problematic to organize experimental data in terms of social distance...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement
سال: 2015
ISSN: 1358-2461,1755-3555
DOI: 10.1017/s1358246115000235